Searching...
Flashcards in this deck (237)
  • What general abilities does the text say 'intellectual ability' encompasses?

    • The ability to learn, remember and use new information
    • To solve problems
    • To adapt to novel situations
    intelligence definition
  • Which animals do researchers and lay people generally agree are among the most intelligent?

    • Primates (monkeys and apes, including humans)
    intelligence animals
  • What evolutionary source of primate intelligence is suggested in the text?

    • Their social nature (living in troops or family groups)
    evolution primates
  • Name four cognitive abilities primates developed due to complex social environments, as listed in the text.

    • Deception
    • Altruism
    • Numerical concepts
    • Theory of mind
    primates social
  • How does the text define 'theory of mind'?

    • A sense of the self as a unique individual separate from others in the group
    theory_of_mind definition
  • What example does the introduction use to illustrate people perceived as 'smart'?

    • Scripps National Spelling Bee contestants (children as young as 8 spelling complex words)
    example spelling_bee
  • What two possible sources of intelligence are posed as questions in the introduction?

    • Heredity
    • Interest
    causes intelligence
  • What does the module promise the reader will be able to do by its end regarding intelligence?

    • Define intelligence and discuss common strategies for measuring intelligence
    module_goals learning_outcome
  • Who proposed that intelligence is a single 'general factor' known as 'g'?

    • Charles Spearman
    intelligence history
  • What observation led Spearman to propose the 'g' factor?

    • People who perform well in one intellectual area tend to perform well in others
    intelligence g
  • What early psychological measurement did Francis Galton perform for three pence?

    • Measurements of physical characteristics (e.g., grip strength) and simple psychological attributes (e.g., distance judgment, color discrimination)
    measurement history
  • What hypothesis did Galton believe about intelligence?

    • Intelligence was heritable similar to height and eye color
    heritability galton
  • What method did Galton popularize to study heritability of psychological traits?

    • Comparing identical and fraternal twins
    heritability twins
  • Who is best known for formally pioneering measurement of intellectual ability with tests for children?

    • Alfred Binet
    measurement binet
  • What unique observation did Binet make about some chess players?

    • Some blindfolded chess players could continue playing using only memory of piece positions
    observation binet
  • What was the basis for items on the Binet-Simon children's test?

    • Items chosen to be answerable by children of specific ages (e.g., point to mouth at 3, name months at 9, name 60 words in 3 minutes at 12)
    binet-simon tests
  • How was the Binet-Simon 'IQ' score originally calculated?

    • Divide a child's mental age (test score) by their chronological age to create a quotient
    iq calculation
  • How is the term 'IQ' used in modern contexts according to the text?

    • To denote intelligence generally or a score on any intelligence test, not just the Binet-Simon test
    iq modern
  • What test did Lewis Terman adapt to create the Stanford-Binet?

    The Binet-Simon test

    intelligence testing
  • What major advantage did Terman's Stanford-Binet test offer?

    It was standardized using a large sample of children

    standardization intelligence
  • How did Terman represent intelligence scores after standardizing the test?

    He plotted scores in a normal distribution (a 'bell curve')

    distribution statistics
  • What criticism did David Wechsler have about the Stanford-Binet?

    It relied heavily on verbal ability and used a single score to capture all intelligence

    criticism wechsler
  • What was Wechsler's approach to measuring intelligence?

    He created a test that tapped a wide range of specific intellectual abilities

    wechsler intelligence
  • Name three abilities assessed by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS).

    • Ability to remember
    • Ability to compute
    • Ability to understand language
    wais abilities
  • What conception of intelligence does Wechsler's test depart from?

    Spearman's concept of general intelligence (single 'g')

    theory intelligence
  • What is the Flynn Effect?

    The gain where newer groups outperform original norming samples on older IQ tests

    flynn trends
  • What is the IQ test average score that allows detection of the Flynn Effect?

    An average score of 100

    iq measurement
  • List three hypotheses proposed to explain the Flynn Effect.

    • Better nutrition
    • Greater familiarity with testing
    • More exposure to visual stimuli
    flynn causes
  • What conclusion do researchers currently have about causes of the Flynn Effect?

    There is no perfect agreement among researchers about its causes

    research flynn
  • What distinction does the passage make between 'street smarts' and 'book smarts'?

    • Street smarts: practical wisdom from experience (e.g., spotting lies, persuading, thinking under pressure)
    • Book smarts: formal education and memory for facts (e.g., large vocabulary, recalling classics)
    intelligence definitions
  • How did Carroll (1993) organize intelligence in his model?

    • Three strata: stratum III (general 'g'), stratum II (broad abilities like fluid intelligence), stratum I (specific components like reaction time)
    carroll models
  • What is the meaning of stratum III in Carroll's hierarchy?

    • Stratum III: the general intelligence factor 'g'
    carroll g
  • Give examples of stratum II and stratum I abilities in Carroll's model from the text.

    • Stratum II: fluid intelligence, visual perception, processing speed
    • Stratum I: spatial scanning, reaction time, word fluency
    carroll abilities
  • How do Horn and Cattell (1966) distinguish types of intelligence?

    • They distinguish fluid and crystallized intelligence, both appearing at stratum II of Carroll's model.
    horn-cattell types
  • What is fluid intelligence as described in the passage?

    • Fluid intelligence: the ability to 'think on your feet' and solve problems, associated more with youth.
    fluid intelligence
  • How is crystallized intelligence defined in the passage?

    • Crystallized intelligence: using language, skills, and experience to address problems; it increases with age.
    crystallized intelligence
  • According to the passage, how do younger and older people tend to differ in problem solving?

    • Younger people: adapt to new situations and use trial-and-error (fluid)
    • Older people: rely on a larger store of knowledge to solve problems (crystallized)
    age problem-solving
  • What is the central idea of Howard Gardner's 'multiple intelligences' theory in the passage?

    • People process information through different relatively independent 'channels', leading to multiple intelligences.
    gardner multiple
  • List the eight intelligences identified by Gardner as given in the text.

    • Logic-math
    • Visual-spatial
    • Music-rhythm
    • Verbal-linguistic
    • Bodily-kinesthetic
    • Interpersonal
    • Intrapersonal
    • Naturalistic
    gardner list
  • What does Gardner's theory of intelligence suggest about learning?

    Gardner's theory suggests that people each learn in unique ways.

    intelligence gardner
  • How has Gardner's theory influenced education worldwide?

    There are many Gardner-influenced schools in the world.

    education gardner
  • How does emotional intelligence differ from traditional models of intelligence?

    Emotional intelligence emphasizes the experience and expression of emotion rather than cognition (thinking).

    intelligence emotional
  • According to some researchers, what skills comprise emotional intelligence?

    Skills to accurately understand others' emotions, identify and label one's own emotions, and use emotions (Mayer & Salovey, 1997).

    emotional skills
  • What alternative view do other researchers have about emotional intelligence?

    They view it as a mixture of abilities (e.g., stress management) and personality (predisposition for certain moods) (Bar-On, 2006).

    emotional theories
  • What workplace outcome is linked to emotional intelligence according to studies?

    Emotional intelligence is linked to job performance (Lopes et al., 2006).

    workplace emotional
  • What did Schmidt and Hunter (1998) report about general intelligence and job types?

    General intelligence is moderately correlated with all job types, especially managerial and complex, technical jobs.

    workplace intelligence
  • What did Schmidt and Hunter find intelligence predicts in workplace training?

    Intelligence is the single best predictor of doing well in job training programs and of learning on the job.

    training intelligence
  • According to Carol Dweck, what mindset leads children to underperform?

    Children who believe abilities and intelligence are fixed traits tend to underperform (Dweck, 1986).

    mindset dweck
  • According to Carol Dweck, which mindset helps children handle failure and perform better?

    Believing intelligence is changeable and evolving (a growth mindset) helps children handle failure and perform better.

    mindset growth
  • What caution is given about interpreting mindset research regarding intelligence potential?

    There is a temptation to think humans have unlimited potential and that becoming smarter is only positive thinking, but evidence shows genetics is an important factor.

    mindset limitations
  • What does genetic research in adults suggest about intelligence inheritance?

    Studies have yielded that intelligence is largely, but not totally, inherited (Bouchard, 2004).

    genetics intelligence
  • According to Ceci, Williams & Barnett (2009), what percentage of engineering faculty were women in 1976?

    • 1%
    statistics gender
  • What range describes women's representation in math-intensive faculty at the 50 top universities 'even today'?

    • 3% to 15%
    statistics gender
  • List one possible explanation mentioned for women's under-representation in certain fields.

    • Inequalities in the educational system
    causes gender
  • List another possible explanation mentioned for women's under-representation in certain fields.

    • Differences in socialization encouraging other interests
    causes gender
  • What childcare-related explanation is given for women's different professional decisions?

    • Women are, on average, responsible for a larger portion of childcare obligations
    causes gender
  • What do Ceci and colleagues (2009) argue about biological and genetic differences accounting for sex differences in intellectual ability?

    • They argue against biological and genetic differences accounting for much of the sex differences
    research gender
  • According to the text, what do Ceci and colleagues (2009) believe better explains sex differences in math-related abilities?

    • A complex web of influences (societal expectations, test taking strategies, individual interests)
    causes gender
  • What does much research suggest about overall differences between the sexes in general intelligence?

    • There is no overall difference between the sexes in general intelligence
    research intelligence
  • Which specific abilities did Halpern (1997) report women, on average, outperform men?

    • **Fine motor skill
    • Acquired knowledge
    • Reading comprehension
    • Decoding non-verbal expression
    • Higher grades in school**
    abilities gender
  • Which specific abilities did Halpern (1997) report men, on average, outperform women?

    • **Fluid reasoning related to math and science
    • Perceptual tasks with moving objects
    • Mental rotations in working memory**
    abilities gender
  • What is 'stereotype threat' as described in the text?

    Stereotype threat is the idea that mental access to a particular stereotype can have a real-world impact on a member of the stereotyped group.

    stereotype social
  • What effect did informing women that 'women tend to fare poorly on math exams' have in Spencer, Steele, & Quinn (1999)?

    Women informed of the stereotype performed worse on a math test relative to a control group who did not hear the stereotype.

    stereotype research
  • What intervention reduced stereotype threat effects for women in Martens et al. (2006)?

    Having women write about personal qualities they valued (a self-affirmation) before a math test largely erased the stereotype threat effect.

    intervention stereotype
  • Did the self-affirmation intervention in Martens et al. (2006) have the same effect for men?

    No; similar affirmations had little effect for men.

    gender research
  • What do researchers say about the current state of evidence on stereotype threat?

    Research on stereotype threat has yielded mixed results and we are currently uncertain about exactly how and when this effect might occur.

    research uncertainty
  • What important question do controversies about sex differences in intelligence measures raise?

    They raise the question of whether there might be a problem with intelligence measures, specifically potential bias against certain groups.

    measurement bias
  • What is the author's conclusion about National Spelling Bee competitors' intelligence?

    They seem to have high verbal intelligence but we cannot determine other types (e.g., emotional or bodily-kinesthetic) from their spelling performance.

    intelligence conclusion
  • According to the text, what possible factors might help explain spelling bee competitors' abilities?

    They may benefit from a genetic boost in intelligence, a supportive social environment, or both.

    talent explanation
  • What overall statement does the text make about the nature of intelligence?

    Intelligence is a complicated issue, and psychologists continue to research it, yielding new insights.

    intelligence research
  • What does the vocabulary term g stand for in the text?

    g stands for the 'general factor' and is often used as synonymous with intelligence.

    vocabulary intelligence
  • How does the text define intelligence?

    Intelligence is an individual's cognitive capability, including the ability to acquire, process, recall, and apply information.

    vocabulary intelligence
  • What is an IQ according to the text?

    IQ is 'intelligence quotient', a score from a widely used measure meant to rank a person's intellectual ability against others.

    vocabulary assessment
  • What is a norm in the context of assessments?

    A norm is the range of scores determined from a representative sample; used to place an individual's score relative to the population.

    vocabulary assessment
  • What does it mean to standardize an assessment in the text?

    Standardize means giving assessments in the exact same manner to all people; standardized scores reference normative scores for a population.

    vocabulary assessment
  • How is stereotype threat described in the text?

    Stereotype threat is when people worry they will conform to a stereotype or that their performance does conform, especially when the stereotype is made conscious.

    vocabulary bias
  • Which three classes of determinants does the text say are needed for effective performance and valued accomplishments?

    Intelligence, interests, and mastery are needed for effective performance and valued accomplishments.

    talent development
  • What analogy from Plato is used to describe intellect, affect, and will?

    Plato's triarchic view depicts intellect as a charioteer and affect (interests) and will (to master) as the horses drawing the chariot.

    history concept
  • What name does the text give to the combined cognitive, affective, and conative factors?

    These combined factors are referred to as 'The Trilogy of Mind' (Hilgard, 1980).

    concept theory
  • According to the text, what happens if there is a deficit in one of the three classes (intelligence, interests, mastery)?

    A deficit in any one can markedly hobble the effectiveness of the others in meeting standards for typical and extraordinary performance.

    talent limitations
  • What term does the text use for causal models that neglect affection and conation?

    • Under-determined or misspecified causal models
    models psychology
  • Which theory is adapted in Figure 1 as a framework for talent development?

    • Theory of Work Adjustment (TWA)
    talent framework
  • What two personal-attribute models are assembled in the framework for talent development?

    • Models of intellectual abilities
    • Educational-occupational interests
    abilities interests
  • In the framework, correspondence between abilities and ability requirements is called what?

    • Satisfactoriness ("competence")
    satisfactoriness competence
  • In the framework, correspondence between interests and reward structures is called what?

    • Satisfaction ("fulfillment")
    satisfaction fulfillment
  • According to the framework, what predicts tenure or a longstanding relationship between individual and environment?

    • Joint occurrence of satisfactoriness and satisfaction
    tenure prediction
  • What two lower-order dimensions underlie the RIASEC hexagon as noted in the text?

    • People/things
    • Data/ideas
    riasec interests
  • What does the dotted line in Figure 1 emphasize about assessment?

    • Equal emphasis on assessing personal attributes and the environment
    assessment framework
  • What do the letters and numbers in the cognitive ability arrangement denote in Figure 1?

    • Letters denote regions of concentration; numbers increase with complexity
    cognition abilities
  • What does the talent development model place equal emphasis on?

    • The individual (abilities and interests)
    • The environment (response requirements and reward structures)
    talent development
  • What common feature unites educational, counseling, and industrial/organizational psychology in this framework?

    They study implementing interventions or opportunities, based on individual differences, to maximize positive psychological growth across the life span.

    psychology framework
  • What approach is recommended beyond asking 'do you like it' and 'can you do it' for personal or institutional development decisions?

    Consider what individuals like the most and can do the best to identify 'optimal promise' for development.

    decision-making development
  • How are cognitive abilities organized according to a consensus over recent decades?

    Cognitive abilities are organized hierarchically.

    cognition hierarchy
  • What graphical model represents the hierarchy of cognitive abilities described in the text?

    A radex (Guttman, 1954) represents the hierarchical organization.

    models radex
  • In the radex model, what does distance from the center represent?

    Distance from the center scales test complexity (center = higher complexity, outward = lower complexity).

    complexity radex
  • In the radex, how is test content represented around the circular bands?

    Test content varies around the bands from spatial/mechanical to verbal/linguistic to quantitative/numerical while complexity remains constant along a band.

    radex content
  • What drives covariation among cognitive ability assessments in the radex framework?

    Assessments covary based on shared content or complexity; more shared content/complexity leads to higher covariance and closer positions in the radex.

    covariation cognitive
  • What will be ultimately linked to cognitive abilities and interests according to the text?

    They will be linked to conative determinants that mobilize and partly account for how capabilities and motives are expressed.

    conation motivation
  • What does the general factor 'g' represent in intelligence research?

    General mental ability representing the complexity/sophistication of a person's intellectual repertoire.

    intelligence g
  • According to the text, how does test complexity relate to measuring g?

    The more complex a test is, regardless of content, the better a measure of g it is.

    testing g
  • Which three specific abilities are identified as chief modalities of thought?

    Mathematical, spatial, and verbal reasoning.

    abilities reasoning
  • Why are different specific ability tests positively correlated according to the passage?

    Because they all index an underlying general property of intellectual thought (g).

    correlation g
  • What range of correlation does g have with educational achievement assessments?

    g covaries with educational achievement assessments in the .70–.80 range.

    education correlation
  • How does g correlate with work performance and job complexity?

    Measures of g covary .20–.60 with work performance as a function of job complexity.

    work performance
  • What correlations with g are reported for income, criminal behavior, and achieved SES?

    g correlates about .30–.40 with income, –.20 with criminal behavior, and .50–.70 with achieved SES.

    outcomes ses
  • What correlation is mentioned for assortative mating on g?

    Assortative mating correlations on g are around .50.

    mating g
  • How does the passage quote Piaget regarding intelligence?

    Piaget: 'Intelligence is what you use when you don't know what to do.'

    quote piaget
  • What do measures of specific abilities index about individuals?

    They index individual differences in different modalities of thought: reasoning with numbers, words, and figures or shapes.

    specific abilities
  • What claim does the passage make about an ability threshold?

    There does not appear to be an ability threshold; more ability continues to matter.

    ability threshold
  • How broadly do assessments of g covary compared to other measures of individuality?

    Assessments of g covary more broadly and deeper than any other measure of human individuality.

    individuality g
  • According to the text, does greater ability affect learning, working, and creating among the top 1%?

    Yes; the text states 'more ability does make a difference in learning, working, and creating, even among the top 1% of ability.'

    ability intelligence
  • What problem limited past demonstrations of individual differences within high-ability groups?

    Intellectual assessments and criterion measures lacked sufficient scope, causing ceiling effects and no variation among the able.

    assessment measurement
  • What corrected the past difficulty in demonstrating variation among the profoundly talented?

    Modern methods that corrected for limited scope in assessments and criterion measures (as cited: Kell, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2013a; Lubinski, 2009; Park, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2007, 2008).

    methods research
  • Does the text claim that measures of g capture all of intellectual functioning?

    No; the text states 'there is much more to intellectual functioning than measures of g or general ability.'

    g intelligence
  • What did Frey and Detterman (2004) show about the SAT composite in high ability samples?

    They showed the SAT composite is an excellent measure of general intelligence for high ability samples.

    sat measurement
  • At what age were intellectually precocious youth assessed on the SAT composite in the described study?

    They were assessed at age 13.

    study age
  • What were the approximate cutting scores at age 13 for the top 1 in 200 before the SAT re-centering?

    SAT-M ≥ 500 and SAT-V ≥ 430.

    sat cutoffs
  • What were the approximate cutting scores at age 13 for the top 1 in 10,000 before the SAT re-centering?

    SAT-M ≥ 700 and SAT-V ≥ 630.

    sat cutoffs
  • What did Figure 3 data (Wai et al., 2009) use to reveal how abilities operate over development?

    Data from over 400,000 high school students assessed between grades 9–12 and tracked for 11 years.

    longitudinal development
  • Which ability profile characterized individuals who pursued advanced degrees in STEM according to the text?

    High general intelligence with an orientation dominated by high mathematical and spatial abilities relative to verbal ability.

    stem abilities
  • How do students who secure STEM degrees compare in overall capability to those in non-STEM domains?

    • Students in STEM domains are more capable than those in other areas, especially in nonverbal intellectual abilities.
    stem ability
  • Within educational domains, how do more advanced degrees relate to abilities?

    • More advanced degrees are associated with higher general and specific abilities.
    education ability
  • For the three STEM educational groupings, which ability is greater: spatial or verbal?

    • Spatial ability > verbal ability for STEM groupings.
    stem spatial
  • For most non-STEM educational domains (e.g., education, biology), which ability is greater: spatial or verbal?

    • Spatial ability < verbal ability for non-STEM domains (business is an exception).
    non-stem verbal
  • Did adolescents who later earned advanced STEM credentials show a different ability pattern in youth?

    • Yes; they manifested a spatial-verbal pattern opposite that of those who earned credentials in other areas.
    development pattern
  • What does level of general ability predict according to the text?

    • Level of general ability predicts the magnitude of accomplishment (how extraordinary they are).
    predictive ability
  • What does ability pattern predict according to the text?

    • Ability pattern predicts the nature of accomplishments (the domains they occur in).
    predictive pattern
  • What does the RIASEC hexagonal model describe in vocational interests?

    A hexagonal structure of six general themes of vocational interests: Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, Conventional.

    riasec vocational
  • Give the main features of the 'Realistic (R)' theme in Holland's model.

    • Realistic (R): working with gadgets and things, the outdoors, need for structure.
    riasec realistic
  • Give the main features of the 'Investigative (I)' theme in Holland's model.

    • Investigative (I): scientific pursuits, especially mathematics and the physical sciences, an interest in theory.
    riasec investigative
  • Give the main features of the 'Artistic (A)' theme in Holland's model.

    • Artistic (A): creative expression in art and writing, little need for structure.
    riasec artistic
  • Give the main features of the 'Social (S)' theme in Holland's model.

    • Social (S): people interests, the helping professions, teaching, nursing, counseling.
    riasec social
  • Give the main features of the 'Enterprising (E)' theme in Holland's model.

    • Enterprising (E): likes leadership roles directed toward economic objectives.
    riasec enterprising
  • Give the main features of the 'Conventional (C)' theme in Holland's model.

    • Conventional (C): liking of well-structured environments and clear chains of command, such as office practices.
    riasec conventional
  • How do the six RIASEC themes covary according to the text?

    They covary inversely with the distance between them around the hexagon: closer themes correlate more than distant ones.

    riasec correlation
  • What comparable framework did Guilford et al. (1954) identify?

    A similar framework labeled Mechanical, Scientific, Aesthetic Expression, Social Welfare, Business, and Clerical based on military data.

    history framework
  • What higher-order themes exist above the RIASEC level mentioned in the text?

    Super-ordinal themes such as people versus things and data versus ideas.

    themes superordinate
  • What relationship exists between interest dimensions and abilities at RIASEC or superordinate levels?

    Interest dimensions covary in different ways with mathematical, spatial, and verbal abilities.

    abilities interests
  • What happens when selection is extremely restricted to a specific ability?

    Distinctive interest profiles emerge across abilities and reflect different 'types'.

    selection development
  • What typical correlation range between abilities and interests does the text report?

    Correlations are 'only' in the .20-.30 range.

    correlation statistics
  • According to the text, why is psychological information on motivational differences needed?

    To understand attractions and aversions, different ways to create a meaningful life, and how differential development unfolds.

    motivation development
  • What observation does the text make about people with the same intellectual equipment?

    They vary widely in their motivational proclivities.

    individuality motivation
  • What does the text say causes extreme, different kinds of intelligence?

    They stem from endpoint extremes within a multivariate space of systematic sources of individual differences, not from different qualities.

    intelligence individual-differences
  • According to the passage, what do conative determinants relate to?

    Individual differences in energy or psychological tempo rather than content of skills or learning speed.

    conation motivation
  • Which personal attributes often 'pull' with endpoint extremes of intelligence?

    Constellations of nonintellectual personal attributes.

    personality intelligence
  • How do skilled educational-vocational counselors use abilities and interests?

    They combine them to distill learning and work environments where individuals are likely to thrive in competence and experience fulfillment.

    vocational counseling
  • What examples of labels for conative attributes are mentioned from historical theorists?

    • Galton: 'zeal'
    • Hull: 'industriousness'
    • Webb: 'will'
    history conation
  • What modern casual labels does the passage give for conative resources?

    • 'grit'
    • 'strivers'
    conation labels
  • What do studies of expertise and world-class accomplishment commonly show about top performers?

    They have indefatigable capacities for study and work, indicating high pace and endurance.

    expertise performance
  • Which researchers or theorists are said to agree that exceptional performers are deeply committed?

    Howard Gardner, Dean Simonton, Arthur Jensen, Anders Ericsson, and Harriet Zuckerman.

    research talent
  • According to Simonton and E. O. Wilson quoted in the passage, what must people do to 'make it big'?

    Organize their whole lives around a single enterprise, start early, and labor with monomaniacal devotion.

    career commitment
  • What consensus is noted in the field of talent development?

    The greatest consensus is found on the topic of conation rather than cognition or affect.

    talent-development conation
  • According to the text, what large individual differences were observed among exceptionally talented individuals?

    • Large differences in how much time people are willing to invest in career development and work
    individual-differences talent
  • What did the study of STEM graduate students show about men and women in their mid-twenties?

    • Both sexes were highly similar on abilities, interests, and personality
    gender stem
  • How did STEM graduate students' time allocation and life priorities change over the life span?

    • They markedly diverged in time allocation and life priorities
    longitudinal development
  • What anecdotal formula did Wilson (1998) give for time needed to succeed in an academic biology career?

    • 40 hours for teaching/admin + 20 hours for respectable research + 20 hours for really important research
    career academia
  • What consequence does the text suggest from two faculty working different weekly hours (45 vs 65) over five years?

    • Large differences are likely to accrue (other things being equal)
    productivity time-investment
  • What three major findings about human individuality does the conclusion list?

    • Intellect is organized hierarchically
    • Interests are multidimensional and only covary slightly with abilities
    • Individual differences are huge in investing in personal development
    conclusion individuality
  • What historical idea does the conclusion reference as a starting point for the study of individual differences?

    • Spearman's (1904) idea of general intelligence
    history intelligence
  • What does combining psychological diversity with attention to opportunities produce, according to the text?

    • A framework for understanding human development
    development framework
  • Which two extraordinary populations were compared in Figure 4 described in the text?

    • Profoundly gifted adolescents identified at age 12
    • First- or second-year STEM graduate students at top-15 U.S. university
    samples research
  • What did subjects report about their 'ideal job' in the longitudinal studies?

    • How much they would be willing to work and how much they actually do work
    longitudinal work
  • What is g or general mental ability as defined in the text?

    • g or general mental ability: A very general mental capacity involving the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience.
    intelligence definitions
  • How does the text define satisfaction in an environmental context?

    • Satisfaction: Correspondence between an individual's needs or preferences and the rewards offered by the environment.
    job satisfaction
  • How is satisfactoriness defined in the text?

    • Satisfactoriness: Correspondence between an individual's abilities and the ability requirements of the environment.
    abilities fit
  • What are specific abilities according to the passage?

    • Specific abilities: Cognitive abilities that include an appreciable component of g but also a large content-focused talent (e.g., mathematical, spatial, or verbal ability).
    intelligence specific
  • What are under-determined or misspecified causal models as described in the text?

    • Under-determined or misspecified causal models: Psychological frameworks that miss or neglect to include one or more critical determinants of the phenomenon under analysis.
    models causality
  • What everyday decision examples does the introduction give to illustrate daily choices?

    • Examples: deciding whether to eat dessert, cheat on a test, or attend a sports event with friends.
    decision-making examples
  • What does the bounded rationality framework claim about human decision making?

    • Bounded rationality: Humans try to make rational decisions but cognitive limitations prevent full rationality.
    decision-making theory
  • What limitations are listed that constrain rational decision making under bounded rationality?

    • Limitations: time and cost constraints on information, limited usable memory, and limits on intelligence and perceptions.
    constraints bounded-rationality
  • According to Bazerman and Moore (2013), what is the first step in making a rational decision about choosing a graduate program?

    • Define the problem (e.g., selecting the right graduate program).
    decisionmaking rationality
  • List the six steps Bazerman and Moore (2013) recommend for making a rational decision.

    • Define the problem
    • Identify criteria
    • Weight the criteria
    • Generate alternatives
    • Rate each alternative on each criterion
    • Compute the optimal decision
    decisionmaking process
  • What does Simon's concept of bounded rationality indicate about human judgment?

    • Judgment deviates from rationality.
    boundedrationality judgment
  • What did Tversky and Kahneman (1974) contribute to understanding judgment and decision making?

    • Diagnosed specific systematic, directional biases that affect human judgment.
    biases decisionresearch
  • How are the biases described by Tversky and Kahneman created according to the text?

    • By the tendency to short-circuit a rational decision process using heuristics (rules of thumb).
    heuristics biases
  • Why is knowledge of decision-making biases useful, as stated in the text?

    • It helps identify flaws in thought processes and reach better decisions.
    applications biases
  • What instruction are participants given for estimating the 10 uncertain quantities in Problem 1?

    Write a best estimate for each quantity and provide a lower and upper bound such that you are 98% confident the range contains the true value.

    probability estimation
  • List two examples of items participants must estimate in Problem 1.

    • The first year the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded
    • The distance from the Earth to the Moon
    examples estimation
  • What confidence level must the bounds reflect in Problem 1?

    98% confidence that the range surrounds the actual quantity.

    confidence estimation
  • What is the main question posed in Problem 2 about executive fraud?

    Whether incidence of significant executive-level management fraud is more than 10 in 1,000 Big Four clients.

    fraud survey
  • What response options are given for the executive fraud question in Problem 2?

    • Yes, more than 10 in 1,000
    • No, fewer than 10 in 1,000
    fraud survey
  • What additional quantitative response does Problem 2 ask from participants?

    Estimate the number of Big Four clients per 1,000 that have significant executive-level management fraud.

    fraud estimation
  • In Problem 3, how many people is the avian disease expected to kill if no program is adopted?

    600 people

    decision scenario
  • According to Problem 3, what is the outcome if Program A is adopted?

    200 people will be saved.

    decision programs
  • In Program B, what are the probabilities and outcomes described for saving people?

    • 1/3 probability that 600 people will be saved
    • 2/3 probability that no one will be saved
    decision-making framing
  • What outcome does Program A offer in the described problem?

    • Program A saves 200 lives for sure
    decision-making framing
  • What bias is illustrated by people being overly certain that their 98% confidence ranges include the true value?

    Overconfidence

    biases overconfidence
  • According to the overconfidence example, how many of ten 98% ranges do most readers actually include the true answers?

    Most readers include between three (30%) and seven (70%) of the correct answers

    overconfidence statistics
  • In the anchoring example, how did different anchors (10 vs 200) affect people's estimates of executive-level management fraud?

    Estimates from those anchored at 10 (out of 1,000) were about half the size of estimates from those anchored at 200

    anchoring biases
  • What general effect does an initial anchor have on judgments, according to the text?

    An initial anchor is likely to influence judgments, with people insufficiently adjusting away from it

    anchoring biases
  • In the disease problem framing, what are the outcomes of Program C?

    • 400 people will die
    decision-making framing
  • In the disease problem framing, what are the outcomes of Program D?

    • 1/3 probability no one will die
    • 2/3 probability 600 people will die
    decision-making framing probability
  • What pattern of choices do most individuals show between Programs A/C and B/D in Tversky & Kahneman's problem?

    Most choose Program A in the saving frame and Program D in the loss frame

    heuristics framing
  • How does framing affect risk preference according to the passage?

    People are risk averse for gains (save lives) and risk seeking for losses (avoid deaths)

    framing risk
  • What is an implied reference point when the problem is framed in terms of saving lives?

    The worst outcome of 600 deaths

    framing reference-point
  • What is an implied reference point when the problem is framed in terms of losses?

    The best outcome of no deaths due to the avian disease

    framing reference-point
  • List three cognitive biases or errors mentioned that affect human judgment.

    • Favoring easily retrieved information
    • Insensitivity to base rates and sample sizes
    • Confirmation bias (search for confirming information)
    biases heuristics
  • What is hindsight bias as described in the passage?

    Claiming a priori knowledge that didn't exist

    biases hindsight
  • What two bounded aspects of decision making did Thaler (2000) propose?

    • Bounded willpower
    • Bounded self-interest
    behavioral-econ bounded-rationality
  • What does bounded willpower explain in everyday behavior?

    Giving greater weight to present concerns than future concerns (e.g., failing to save for retirement)

    bounded-rationality willpower
  • How does Thaler describe bounded self-interest?

    Caring about outcomes of others, sometimes valuing their outcomes positively (e.g., fairness)

    bounded-rationality self-interest
  • What does the concept of 'bounded ethicality' refer to?

    The notion that our ethics are limited in ways we are not even aware of ourselves.

    decision-making ethics
  • What is 'bounded awareness' as developed by Chugh and Bazerman (2007)?

    The broad array of focusing failures that cause us to fail to notice obvious and important information available to us.

    decision-making attention
  • How have judgment and decision-making research impacted other fields?

    They transformed behavioral economics, behavioral finance, and behavioral marketing by applying and extending judgment and decision-making research.

    applications behavioral
  • What did early research (Fischhoff, 1982) show about awareness of biases?

    Awareness of biases does little to reduce those biases.

    bias research
  • What distinction do Stanovich and West (2000) make in decision making?

    They distinguish between System 1 (intuitive) and System 2 (deliberative) decision making.

    system1 system2
  • List key characteristics of System 1 processing.

    • Fast
    • Automatic
    • Effortless
    • Implicit
    • Emotional
    system1 characteristics
  • List key characteristics of System 2 processing.

    • Slower
    • Conscious
    • Effortful
    • Explicit
    • Logical
    characteristics system2
  • When is a complete System 2 process recommended?

    Preferably for our most important decisions.

    decision-making practice
  • What tendency increases reliance on System 1 thinking?

    Being busier, more rushed, or having more on one's mind.

    cognitive-load behavior
  • Why might executives often rely on System 1 thinking?

    Because the frantic pace of professional life makes them more likely to rely on System 1 thinking.

    executives work
  • What is a key path to reducing biases and improving decisions?

    Transitioning from trusting intuitive System 1 thinking toward engaging more deliberative System 2 thought.

    bias-reduction strategy
  • What decision-making problem did Michael Lewis (2003) identify in baseball executives?

    Baseball executives overgeneralize from personal experiences, overweight recent performance, and overvalue what they see, producing biased decisions.

    decisionmaking bias
  • How did Billy Beane improve the Oakland Athletics' outcomes according to Lewis (2003)?

    By substituting valid predictors of future performance (System 2 thinking) for biased intuition, improving team performance despite a limited payroll.

    strategy system2
  • What is the core idea of Thaler and Sunstein's 'Nudge' (2008)?

    Decision architects can change environments to account for human bias and trigger better decisions without debiasing individuals directly.

    nudge decisionarchitecture
  • What effect did automatic enrollment (opt-out default) have on 401(k) participation in Beshears et al. (2008)?

    Automatic enrollment with an opt-out option significantly increases net enrollment in employer 401(k) programs.

    defaults behavioral
  • What human tendency do default changes counteract, as shown in the 401(k) example?

    The tendency to stick with the status quo (inaction) and delay proactive enrollment decisions.

    statusquo defaults
  • What did Johnson and Goldstein's (2003) organ donation study compare?

    Opt-in policies (require proactive consent) versus opt-out policies (default to donation) across European countries.

    organ policy
  • What were the consent rate ranges for opt-in versus opt-out organ donation policies reported by Johnson and Goldstein (2003)?

    Opt-in consent rates ranged from 4.25% to 44%; opt-out consent rates ranged from 85.9% to 99.98%.

    statistics organ
  • What conclusion did the organ donation example illustrate about decision architecture?

    Changing defaults can dramatically increase donation rates without changing the options available to citizens.

    decisionarchitecture defaults
  • According to the text, why do intuitive defaults sometimes lead to harmful outcomes?

    Intuitive defaults that ignore human biases can produce choices that cause large harms, such as unnecessary deaths from low organ consent rates.

    harm bias
  • What research topic does Dr. Anita Tusche study at Queen's University?

    Dr. Anita Tusche studies human decision making.

    research decision-making
  • According to the text, is human decision making always rational?

    No; the text states rationality is desirable but not always present when humans make judgments or decisions.

    rationality judgment
  • What is the role of psychological science in decision making as described in the video?

    To understand what guides judgments and decision making and to use that knowledge to promote better decision strategies.

    psychology applications
  • What did Simon, Kahneman, and Tversky's work highlight about human decision making?

    They highlighted the surprising and predictable deficiencies of the human mind when making decisions.

    history biases
  • What is 'anchoring' as defined in the vocabulary?

    The bias to be affected by an initial anchor, even if arbitrary, and to insufficiently adjust judgments away from it.

    biases anchoring
  • How are 'biases' defined in the text?

    Systematic and predictable mistakes that influence the judgment of even very talented human beings.

    biases definition
  • What does 'bounded awareness' refer to?

    The systematic ways in which we fail to notice obvious and important information available to us.

    bounded-awareness attention
  • Define 'bounded ethicality' from the vocabulary list.

    The systematic ways in which our ethics are limited in ways we are not even aware of ourselves.

    ethics bounded-ethicality
  • What is 'bounded rationality' according to the text?

    A model suggesting humans try to make rational decisions but are bounded due to cognitive limitations.

    bounded-rationality models
  • What does 'bounded self-interest' describe?

    The systematic and predictable ways in which we care about the outcomes of others.

    social bounded-self-interest
  • What is 'bounded willpower'?

    The tendency to place greater weight on present concerns rather than future concerns.

    self-control bounded-willpower
  • How is 'framing' defined in the vocabulary?

    The bias to be systematically affected by the way information is presented while objective information is constant.

    framing biases
  • What are 'heuristics' as given in the text?

    Cognitive strategies that simplify decision making by using mental short-cuts.

    heuristics decision-making
  • What does 'overconfident' mean in this vocabulary?

    The bias to have greater confidence in your judgment than is warranted based on a rational assessment.

    overconfidence biases
  • How is 'System 1' characterized?

    Our intuitive decision-making system: typically fast, automatic, effortless, implicit, and emotional.

    system1 dual-process
  • What is 'System 2' in decision-making?

    System 2 is our more deliberative decision-making system that is slower, conscious, effortful, explicit, and logical.

    decision-making cognition
Study Notes

Intelligence — Key Study Notes

Overview

  • Intelligence: cognitive capacity to learn, reason, remember, solve problems, and adapt to novel situations.
  • Measurement and theory evolved from early work (Galton, Binet, Spearman) to modern hierarchical models (Carroll) and applied tests (Stanford–Binet, WAIS).

Historical development & measurement

  • Francis Galton: early measurements of ability and the idea that psychological traits might be heritable; twin methods precursor.
  • Alfred Binet & Simon: created the first practical children’s test; introduced the concept of mental age and the original IQ formula:

\(\(IQ = \frac{\text{mental age}}{\text{chronological age}} \times 100\)\)

  • Lewis Terman: standardized and popularized the Stanford–Binet; scores distributed on a bell curve with mean \(100\).
  • David Wechsler (WAIS): emphasized multiple specific abilities rather than a single overall score.
  • Flynn Effect: average test scores rose across generations; proposed causes include better nutrition, familiarity with tests, and richer environments.

Core theoretical views

  • Spearman — g: general intelligence factor (g) inferred because performance on different cognitive tasks correlates.
  • Wechsler & others: intelligence as a set of specific abilities (memory, processing speed, verbal, etc.).
  • Carroll’s three-stratum model: hierarchical structure with Stratum III = g, Stratum II = broad abilities (fluid, crystallized, processing speed), Stratum I = narrow skills.

Major types / models of intelligence

  • Fluid vs. crystallized: fluid = problem solving and novel reasoning (peaks in youth); crystallized = accumulated knowledge and skills (often increases with age).
  • Multiple Intelligences (Gardner): eight relatively independent channels (e.g., logical-mathematical, linguistic, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic).
  • Emotional intelligence: abilities to perceive, understand, and regulate emotions; linked to job performance.

Predictive value of g and specific abilities

  • g correlates strongly with educational outcomes (\(r\approx 0.70\)\(0.80\)) and moderately with job performance (\(r\approx 0.20\)\(0.60\) depending on job complexity).
  • High g remains predictive even at the top end (top 1%); both ability level and ability pattern (e.g., high spatial vs. verbal) predict the magnitude and domain of future accomplishments.

Talent development framework (Theory of Work Adjustment adaptation)

  • Three pillars for high achievement: Abilities (cognition), Interests (affect/motivation), Mastery/Conation (will, effort, persistence).
  • Person–environment correspondence:
  • Satisfactoriness = abilities match job/learning requirements.
  • Satisfaction = interests match reward/values of the environment.
  • Both predict tenure and success.

Interests: RIASEC and higher-order themes

  • Holland's RIASEC hexagon: Realistic (R), Investigative (I), Artistic (A), Social (S), Enterprising (E), Conventional (C).
  • Superordinate dimensions: People vs. Things and Data vs. Ideas; interests modestly correlate with abilities (typical correlations \(r\approx 0.20\)\(0.30\)) but shape career direction when selection is extreme.

Mastery / Conative factors (grit, industriousness)

  • Noncognitive traits (persistence, time investment, intensity of practice) strongly influence long-term achievement even among similarly able individuals.
  • Empirical data show large individual differences in hours willing to work and actual hours worked, which translate into divergent career outcomes.

Group differences and controversies

  • General intelligence shows little overall sex difference; specific skill differences appear on average (e.g., women higher on verbal and fine motor skills; men higher on some visuospatial and certain math reasoning tasks).
  • Explanations are multifactorial: socialization, educational opportunities, interests, childcare/role differences, test strategies — not solely genetics.
  • Stereotype threat: activating a negative stereotype about a group can depress performance (e.g., women and math); self-affirmation can sometimes reduce the effect.
  • Ongoing discussion about bias in tests and the need to detect and correct systematic measurement biases.

Practical implications for education & workplaces

  • Use combined information on abilities, interests, and commitment to match people to roles where they can excel.
  • Recognize both level (how able) and pattern (relative strengths) to predict domain of achievement.
  • Pay attention to environmental supports and reward structures (defaults, incentives) to improve outcomes.

Vocabulary (concise)

  • g: general factor common to cognitive tasks.
  • IQ: intelligence quotient; standardized score (population mean \(100\)).
  • Norm / Standardize: reference sample and uniform administration to interpret scores.
  • Stereotype threat: performance harm caused by awareness of a negative stereotype.
  • Satisfactoriness / Satisfaction: fit of abilities to requirements / interests to rewards.
  • Specific abilities: content-focused talents (math, spatial, verbal) that also load on g.

Judgment & Decision Making — Key Study Notes

Core concepts

  • Bounded rationality (Simon): people aim to be rational but cognitive limits (time, memory, information) constrain optimal choice.
  • Heuristics & biases (Tversky & Kahneman): mental shortcuts that simplify decisions but create predictable errors.
  • System 1 / System 2 (Stanovich & West): System 1 = fast, automatic, intuitive; System 2 = slow, deliberative, logical.

Common biases and examples

  • Overconfidence: people overestimate accuracy — e.g., when providing \(98\%\) confidence intervals, most ranges miss the true value far more often than \(2\%\).
  • Anchoring: initial numbers (even arbitrary) pull subsequent estimates toward the anchor.
  • Framing: equivalent outcomes framed as gains versus losses produce different choices (risk-averse for gains, risk-seeking for losses). Example: save 200 lives for sure vs. probabilistic alternatives.
  • Other biases: availability, base-rate neglect, confirmation bias, hindsight bias, misperception of randomness.

Extensions of bounded models

  • Bounded willpower: short-term impulses overweighted vs. long-term plans (e.g., saving for retirement).
  • Bounded self-interest: people care about others and sometimes sacrifice self-interest.
  • Bounded ethicality: ethical limits and blind spots that people don’t recognize.
  • Bounded awareness: failures to notice important, available information.

Improving decisions (practical fixes)

  • Engage System 2 for important choices by slowing down, structuring decisions, and following stepwise procedures (define problem, list criteria, weight criteria, generate and rate alternatives, choose).
  • Use decision architecture / nudges: change defaults or choice presentation to steer better outcomes without removing options (e.g., auto-enroll in 401(k) dramatically raises participation; opt-out organ donation greatly increases consent rates).
  • Apply valid predictors and data-driven methods rather than overreliance on intuition (example: sabermetrics in baseball).

Takeaways

  • Humans are predictably irrational in many domains; awareness of biases helps but often is not enough.
  • Combining structural fixes (defaults, decision aids) with deliberative practices (System 2) improves decisions.

Key vocabulary (concise)

  • Anchoring: anchor influences estimates.
  • Framing: choices affected by how options are presented.
  • Heuristics: mental shortcuts producing biases.
  • System 1 / System 2: intuitive vs. deliberative thinking.
  • Nudge / decision architecture: environment design to produce better choices.

Recommended study actions

  • Memorize major names and ideas: Spearman (g), Binet (IQ), Wechsler (multiple abilities), Carroll (hierarchy), Tversky & Kahneman (biases), Simon (bounded rationality), Dweck (mindset).
  • Be able to explain difference between g and specific abilities, and the roles of abilities, interests, and mastery in talent development.
  • Practice identifying biases in real decisions and suggest one System 2 or architectural fix.